Sign In | Create Account

 
|| आ नो भद्राः क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वतः || Let nobel thoughts come to us from everywhere, from all the world || 1.89.1 Rigveda ||
Section : Politics
Latest: 

Panetta Memoir: White House Too \'Eager to Rid Itself of Iraq\'
 
Many critics of the president's pullout have blamed it for the chaos engulfing Iraq today, with the radical Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, laying siege to that country as well as Syria.

By Sean Piccoli,Newsmax




President Barack Obama rejected multiple warnings that Iraq might slide back into anarchy and become a terrorist haven without a substantial U.S. troop force in place after 2011, Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta writes in his forthcoming memoir, "Worthy Fights."

In an excerpt published in Time, Panetta writes that he was among those arguing forcefully for some troops to remain to help protect gains that the U.S. had paid dearly for in eight years of fighting.

But he writes that "those on our side viewed the White House as so eager to rid itself of Iraq that it was willing to withdraw rather than lock in arrangements that would preserve our influence and interests."


The book expands on criticisms that Panetta, Obama's former secretary of defense and director of central intelligence, leveled at the president on "60 Minutes."

Many critics of the president's pullout have blamed it for the chaos engulfing Iraq today, with the radical Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, laying siege to that country as well as Syria.

"Worthy Fights," which goes on sale Tuesday, details the failure to get a status-of-forces deal that would have allowed a force to remain, and with immunity from prosecution by Iraqis.

"We had leverage," Panetta writes of the negotiations with Iraq's government, led by then-Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

"We could, for instance, have threatened to withdraw reconstruction aid to Iraq if al-Maliki would not support some sort of continued U.S. military presence," Panetta writes.

But with the December 2011 exit date approaching, Panetta writes that to his own "frustration," the White House didn't seem to have its heart in a troop deal with al-Maliki.

The White House "coordinated the negotiations but never really lead them," writes Panetta, adding that "without the Preisdent's active advocacy, al-Maliki was allowed to slip away."

The last U.S. troops left Iraq on Dec. 18, 2011, although some military advisers and Special Forces operatives have returned to coordinate U.S. airstrikes against ISIS and assist Iraqi ground forces.

"To this day," Panetta writes, "I believe that a small U.S. troop presence in Iraq could have effectively advised the Iraqi military on how to deal with al-Qaida’s resurgence and the sectarian violence that has engulfed the country."



Comment Form

  Name

 Email Address

 Website

 Write Your Comment Here

 


0 Comment


Suggested articles...

A Hindu Demographic Debacle In Kerala Is Unfolding Before Our Very Eyes
By Rajeev Srinivasan

Read More
WATCH: Maher on Paris shooting: We have to stop saying 'we should not insult a great religion'
By Haaretz

Read More
Why China, Pakistan and US are eyeing India's 'string of pearls'
By Minhaz Merchant

Read More
From Glasgow girl to 'bedroom radical' and ISIS bride-1
By Atika Shubert and Bharati Naik, CNN

Read More
Amartya Sen’s Kerala Model fails to deliver Textbooks
By Offstumped, NITI CENTRAL

Read More
My HQ Was At Uri, The Attack On It Has Thrown Up Institutional Defects We Have Grown To Live With
By Syed Ata Hasnain

Read More
MUGHALISTAN
By Srinandan [This is a greatly abridged version of t

Read More
OPEN LETTER to the Editor of Swarajya, and to V. Anantha Nangeswaran,
By Thea (Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet)

Read More
Hanuman temple destroyed and Idol Thrown on road in Bengal, No FIR registered
By Satya Vijay

Read More
Pakistan hunting for network of female ISIL fundraisers
By AFP And Al Jazeera

Read More